Perceptual Learning of speech sounds: A bias for 'sipper' over 'zipper'?
Abstract
Please refer to 'supplementary file' for official abstract.
Despite huge variability in the incoming acoustical information, listeners efficiently map speech sounds into appropriate categories. Perceptual learning has been proposed as a cognitive mechanism that can account for this acoustic variation by updating a listener’s existing phonetic categories using clues from the lexical context (Norris, McQueen & Cutler, 2003). Perceptual learning of speech is especially relevant in multicultural contexts, including urban centers across Canada. Listeners are exposed to accented speech and novel pronunciations of different interlocutors in their day-to-day lives, and must accommodate these productions in order to successfully communicate.
While perceptual learning may assist in the processing of dialect and accent differences (Kraljic, Brennan & Samuel, 2008; Crista et al., 2012) and non-canonical speech (Kraljic, Brennan & Samuel, 2008b) across the lifespan (White & Aslin, 2011; Trude et al., 2013; Witteman et al., 2013), little is known about whether some pronunciations are easier to perceptually learn than others. The present study investigates whether a bias for perceptually learning typologically more prevalent devoiced fricatives over voiced fricatives exists by exposing listeners to sentence stimuli with sentence-final voiceless [s] and voiced [z] items (e.g. ‘He couldn't handle any more dinner, but there might be room for dessert’). A lexical decision task follows the exposure phase, measuring participants recalibration of [z] and [s]. Stimuli were produced naturally by one speaker, without synthesizing the placement of the critical fricatives [z] or [s] (see Weatherholtz, 2015). We predict listeners will learn the typologically more common devoicing pattern better than the voicing pattern (e.g. [ ] will be learned better than [ ]). This project contributes to our understanding of which attributes of the speech signal facilitate perceptual learning.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author Licensing Addendum
This Licensing Addendum ("Addendum") is entered into between the undersigned Author(s) and Canadian Acoustics journal published by the Canadian Acoustical Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Publisher"). The Author(s) and the Publisher agree as follows:
-
Retained Rights: The Author(s) retain(s) the following rights:
- The right to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display the Work on the Author's personal website or the website of the Author's institution.
- The right to use the Work in the Author's teaching activities and presentations.
- The right to include the Work in a compilation for the Author's personal use, not for sale.
-
Grant of License: The Author(s) grant(s) to the Publisher a worldwide exclusive license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and display the Work in Canadian Acoustics and any other formats and media deemed appropriate by the Publisher.
-
Attribution: The Publisher agrees to include proper attribution to the Author(s) in all publications and reproductions of the Work.
-
No Conflict: This Addendum is intended to be in harmony with, and not in conflict with, the terms and conditions of the original agreement entered into between the Author(s) and the Publisher.
-
Copyright Clause: Copyright on articles is held by the Author(s). The corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all Authors and does grant on behalf of all Authors, a worldwide exclusive license to the Publisher and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), including but not limited to the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, display, store, translate, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections, and create summaries, extracts, and/or abstracts of the Contribution.