Development of a Method to Assess In-Ear Speech Intelligibility Through Listening Effort

Authors

  • Alexis Pinsonnault-Skvarenina Université du Québec (ÉTS), Montréal, Québec, CanadaCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada, CA
  • Philippe Chabot EERS Global Technologies Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada, CA
  • Ajin Tom EERS Global Technologies Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada, CA
  • Antoine Bernier EERS Global Technologies Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada, CA

Abstract

Active hearing protection devices equipped with an in-ear microphone enable in-ear voice pickup which, presents better signal-to-noise ratio over ambient microphones in highly noisy conditions. To improve its intelligibility, in-ear speech requires processing which can take many forms, from fixed filtering to spectral domain processing based on machine learning. Comparing these processing strategies objectively can be difficult. In the authors’ experience, objective intelligibility assessment techniques like the modified rhyme test have not provided the necessary resolution to compare various processed in-ear speech. They have also failed to capture a concept of listening effort, which intuitively seemed to increase with in-ear speech over reference speech whenrecorded in silence.This work presents the early development and preliminary validation of a technique that objectively measures intelligibility of speech material and its associated listening effort. Using a dual task paradigm, the attentional and cognitive resources required to understand speech were quantified. Ten participants performed a closed-set word recognition task and visual pattern recognition task separately and concurrently. Accuracy data were collected for in-ear and reference speech in noise. Dual-task costs (DTC) were calculated.Speech intelligibility was low and listening effort was high for reference speech presented with an 85 dB(A) competing noise. When reducing the competing noise level to 80 dB(A), speech intelligibility improved, but listening effort remained important. While in-ear speech (with and without speech processing) presented with high levels of intelligibility, they also presented with better listening effort than reference speech with competing noise. Our results suggest that a dual-task paradigm to measure listening effort can be a good approach to behaviorally evaluate in-ear speech. Our pilot study supports the use of in-ear speech to improve communication in noisy settings while quantifying its potential for further improvements.

Additional Files

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

1.
Pinsonnault-Skvarenina A, Chabot P, Tom A, Bernier A. Development of a Method to Assess In-Ear Speech Intelligibility Through Listening Effort. Canadian Acoustics [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 9 [cited 2024 Apr. 27];51(3):220-1. Available from: https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/4033

Issue

Vol. 51 No. 3 (2023): Proceedings of Acoustics Week in Canada 2023 Conference

Section

Proceedings of the Acoustics Week in Canada

License

Author Licensing Addendum

This Licensing Addendum ("Addendum") is entered into between the undersigned Author(s) and Canadian Acoustics journal published by the Canadian Acoustical Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Publisher"). The Author(s) and the Publisher agree as follows:

  1. Retained Rights: The Author(s) retain(s) the following rights:

    • The right to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display the Work on the Author's personal website or the website of the Author's institution.
    • The right to use the Work in the Author's teaching activities and presentations.
    • The right to include the Work in a compilation for the Author's personal use, not for sale.

  2. Grant of License: The Author(s) grant(s) to the Publisher a worldwide exclusive license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and display the Work in Canadian Acoustics and any other formats and media deemed appropriate by the Publisher.

  3. Attribution: The Publisher agrees to include proper attribution to the Author(s) in all publications and reproductions of the Work.

  4. No Conflict: This Addendum is intended to be in harmony with, and not in conflict with, the terms and conditions of the original agreement entered into between the Author(s) and the Publisher.

  5. Copyright Clause: Copyright on articles is held by the Author(s). The corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all Authors and does grant on behalf of all Authors, a worldwide exclusive license to the Publisher and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), including but not limited to the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, display, store, translate, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections, and create summaries, extracts, and/or abstracts of the Contribution.