Comparison between modelled and measured sound levels for a Southern Alberta Wind Farm
A 38-day post construction comprehensive sound survey has been carried out as part of the AUC license for a southern Alberta wind farm. Measured sound levels at three receptor locations are compared to the modelled sound levels according to the NIA. How do the results line up? Was the modelling too conservative or too optimistic or just right? What are possible causes of the differences encountered? What are issues encountered during the field program that influence the outcome of the comprehensive sound survey? Why 38 days of monitoring? Would different modelling have resulted in a better prediction? What lessons can be learned?
Henk de Haan Eur. Ing, INCE Bd. Cert. & Virgini Senden, Eur. Ing, INCE Bd. Cert.
(403) 836 8806 (587) 439 9980
How to Cite
Copyright on articles is held by the author(s). The corresponding author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide exclusive licence (or non-exclusive license for government employees) to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known now or created in the future)
i) to publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution;
ii) to translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution;
iii) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution,
iv) to provide the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located;
v) to licence any third party to do any or all of the above.