Speech auditory brainstem responses and words-in-noise recognition scores: is there a link?
Difficulties recognizing speech in the presence of background noise are often associated with school-based learning problems. One could expect that early identification of these listening difficulties could prevent negative impacts on academic success. Unfortunately, the lack of adequate clinical tools makes it impossible to do so before the age of six. With a view to develop a screening tool for listening difficulties in noise using speech evoked ABR, the aim of this study was to investigate a possible correlation between speech auditory brainstem responses and the performance measured at a words-in- noise recognition task. Forty-five normal hearing adults participated in this study and were divided into three groups. Behavioral measures included a speech recognition task in which a list of words was presented without noise for one condition (quiet), and with a competitive white noise for the other condition(noise). Speech-evoked ABR measures followed, using a recorded syllable presented with and without a competitive noise. A different signal-to- noise ratio (SNR) was used for each group in the noise conditions. As expected, lower word recognition scores were noted in the noise compared to quiet conditions. The lowest average score was obtained by the group exposed to the most difficult SNR. Differences were also observed on the electrophysiological components measured with and without the noise, but the changes were not linear. Interpretations about the relationship between brainstem function and speech recognition in noise performance will be presented. This study contributes to a better understanding of the brainstem responses as a quantifiable measure of the neural encoding of speech sounds and furthermore, to allow for early detection of speech recognition problems in noise.
i) to publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution;
ii) to translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution;
iii) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution,
iv) to provide the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located;
v) to licence any third party to do any or all of the above.