A comparison between CROS hearing aids and bone-anchored hearing aids for patients with single-sided deafness: a listening effort-based pilot study
Abstract
Single-sided deafness (SSD) is characterized by the near or total loss of hearing in one ear with normal hearing in the contralateral ear and it gives rise to a functional listening handicap. By causing an acoustic head shadow in the auditory hemifield ipsilateral to the impaired ear, SSD impairs speech-in-noise recognition and sound localization, in addition to a diminished awareness of sounds in the shadowed auditory hemifield. The dominant therapeutic approach to improve processing of sounds coming from this auditory hemifield consists in rerouting acoustic signals to the contralateral non-impaired ear. This can be achieved, for instance, through either air conduction (e.g., contralateral-routing-of-signal – CROS – hearing aids) or bone conduction (e.g., bone-anchored – BA – hearing aids) approaches.
The perceived benefits reported by SSD patients when using BA and CROS hearing aids are difficult to document using clinical measures. Consequently, it is still unclear which device produces the best results, yielding an unresolved dilemma in the clinical management of SSD. This has led to a long-standing controversy regarding the best choice of device, which stems in part from the lack of an objective assessment of the subjectively reported reduction in listening effort, and also from the fact that the funding modalities tend to differ for each device.
This research project aims to solve this long-standing controversy by investigating which device produces the best hearing outcomes for SSD patients by using behavioral (NASA Task Load Index) and pupillometric measurements to evaluate which type of hearing aid requires the least cognitive effort when SSD patients perform speech-in-noise recognition tasks. Results from this research project has the potential to constitute the first objective evidence to orient the management of SSD to maximize patients’ benefit and provide evidence-based justification of funding policies.Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author Licensing Addendum
This Licensing Addendum ("Addendum") is entered into between the undersigned Author(s) and Canadian Acoustics journal published by the Canadian Acoustical Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Publisher"). The Author(s) and the Publisher agree as follows:
-
Retained Rights: The Author(s) retain(s) the following rights:
- The right to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display the Work on the Author's personal website or the website of the Author's institution.
- The right to use the Work in the Author's teaching activities and presentations.
- The right to include the Work in a compilation for the Author's personal use, not for sale.
-
Grant of License: The Author(s) grant(s) to the Publisher a worldwide exclusive license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and display the Work in Canadian Acoustics and any other formats and media deemed appropriate by the Publisher.
-
Attribution: The Publisher agrees to include proper attribution to the Author(s) in all publications and reproductions of the Work.
-
No Conflict: This Addendum is intended to be in harmony with, and not in conflict with, the terms and conditions of the original agreement entered into between the Author(s) and the Publisher.
-
Copyright Clause: Copyright on articles is held by the Author(s). The corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all Authors and does grant on behalf of all Authors, a worldwide exclusive license to the Publisher and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats, and media (whether known now or created in the future), including but not limited to the rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, display, store, translate, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections, and create summaries, extracts, and/or abstracts of the Contribution.