Laboratory performance of the single-sided E-A-R&reg combat arms hearing protective earplug

Authors

  • Sharon M. Abel Individual Readiness Section, Defence Research and Development Canada - Toronto, 1133 Sheppard Avenue West, Toronto, ON M3M 3B9, Canada
  • Christina Powlesland Individual Readiness Section, Defence Research and Development Canada - Toronto, 1133 Sheppard Avenue West, Toronto, ON M3M 3B9, Canada

Keywords:

Acoustic generators, White noise, Centre frequency, Error types, Hearing loss, Hearing protection, Hearing threshold, Horizontal planes, Key factors, Laboratory performance, Mode of operations, Modes of operation, Noise bands, Normal hearing, Sound attenuation, Sound source identification

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of wearing conventional and passive level-dependent hearing protection earplugs on hearing and horizontal plane sound source identification, in quiet. A single device was tested that incorporated these as separate modes of operation. Ten males and ten females with normal hearing participated. Each was tested with the ears unoccluded and fitted binaurally with the device in each mode. Measurements were made of free-field hearing thresholds for one-third octave noise bands with centre frequencies ranging from 250 Hz to 8000 Hz and the ability to discriminate among eight speakers surrounding the subject at a distance of 1 metre. The stimulus was a 300-ms, 75-dB SPL white noise burst. The sound attenuation was derived from the hearing thresholds. With the device in the conventional mode, mean thresholds were in the range of 36.2 dB to 53.3 dB SPL, signifying an induced mild hearing loss. In the level-dependent mode, thresholds were at most 37.9 dB SPL. Mean attenuation values were generally similar to the manufacturer's specifications. There was no effect of gender. Percent correct for sound source identification decreased by 40% with the conventional mode and by 20% with the level-dependent mode. Degree of attention, then appears to be a key factor for outcome. However, an analysis of error types showed that the level-dependent mode of operation resulted in a frontward bias that was similar to that observed previously with a device incorporating external microphones for enhanced communication.

Additional Files

Published

2010-06-01

How to Cite

1.
Abel SM, Powlesland C. Laboratory performance of the single-sided E-A-R&reg combat arms hearing protective earplug. Canadian Acoustics [Internet]. 2010 Jun. 1 [cited 2024 Sep. 17];38(2):11-8. Available from: https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/2218

Issue

Section

Technical Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>