Impact sound ratings: ASTM versus ISO

Auteurs-es

  • A.C.C. Warnock Inst. for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0R6, Canada

Mots-clés :

Attenuation, Data acquisition, Frequencies, Problem solving, Standardization, ASTM, Floor coverings, ISO, Sound ratings

Résumé

A comparison between the impact sound ratings of ASTM and ISO are discussed. When differences in these metrics are used to rank floor toppings, the rankings are inconsistent. To ISO 717 C50 rating, because of the low frequencies leads to unacce[tably large reproducibility ranges for tests on floors but should be acceptable for toppings. The C type ratings are not mandatory in ISO 717.

Fichiers supplémentaires

Publié-e

2004-09-01

Comment citer

1.
Warnock A. Impact sound ratings: ASTM versus ISO. Canadian Acoustics [Internet]. 1 sept. 2004 [cité 15 mai 2026];32(3):170-1. Disponible à: https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/1682

Numéro

Rubrique

Actes du congrès de la Semaine canadienne d'acoustique