The effect of meteorology and terrain on noise propagation - Comparison of five modelling methodologies

Auteurs-es

  • Scott Penton Rowan Williams Davies Irwin, Inc., 650 Woodlawn Road West, Guelph, Ont., N1K 1B8, Canada
  • David Chadder Rowan Williams Davies Irwin, Inc., 650 Woodlawn Road West, Guelph, Ont., N1K 1B8, Canada
  • Seton Stiebert Rowan Williams Davies Irwin, Inc., 650 Woodlawn Road West, Guelph, Ont., N1K 1B8, Canada
  • Valerie Sifton Rowan Williams Davies Irwin, Inc., 650 Woodlawn Road West, Guelph, Ont., N1K 1B8, Canada

Mots-clés :

Acoustic intensity measurement, Acoustic receivers, Acoustic wave propagation, Acoustic wave velocity, Algorithms, Atmospheric temperature, Computer simulation, Electric power plants, Meteorology, Petrochemical plants, Thermal effects, Wind effects, Atmospheric attenuation, Noise propagation, Sound levels, Terrain

Résumé

Significant differences in predicted noise levels can result, depending on which noise propagation algorithm is used in the modelling. Noise modellers should be aware of the limitations of the models they use. Over the distances involved, no model could be expected to be completely accurate. Still, the differences between the ENM and CONCAWE results seem to be extreme.

Fichiers supplémentaires

Publié-e

2002-12-01

Comment citer

1.
Penton S, Chadder D, Stiebert S, Sifton V. The effect of meteorology and terrain on noise propagation - Comparison of five modelling methodologies. Canadian Acoustics [Internet]. 1 déc. 2002 [cité 13 févr. 2025];30(4):30-3. Disponible à: https://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/1515

Numéro

Rubrique

Actes du congrès de la Semaine canadienne d'acoustique